Monday, July 06, 2009

Staying the Course…But What Course?

With the news coming on Sunday from Mark Shapiro that The Atomic Wedgie and his coaching staff will finish out the season, I’m surprised at the reaction that I’m feeling…it’s not anger or rage or even an urge to release vitriolic condemnation on the decision.

Rather, all I feel is disappointment and dread.
Not disappointment that a man gets to keep his job or that the season is suddenly lost (as that feeling came during a walk out of Wrigley Field a few Saturdays ago), but the disappointment that I feel is that the obviousness that a message needed to be sent to acknowledge that the present course that the Indians find themselves on is an unacceptable one and that a sign that continuing on such a path is not condoned needed to be sent.

Whether that’s fair to scapegoat Eric Wedge or one of his coaches is up for debate, as (by Shapiro’s own admission) there’s plenty of blame to go around and simply blaming one man for the mess is an unfortunate conclusion to draw. But a conclusion needs to come for this organization to draw a line by which they can move on, and the opportunity to draw that line neatly and forcefully has now come and gone.

However, disappointment is not the overwhelming feeling that fills me…no, that would be dread.

Why, you ask?
Well, we all know what happens if the Indians’ slide continues into the second half as Wedge and most of his coaching staff will be let go (certainly no declaration was made that Wedge is “manager for life”…at least I hope not) and the Indians will attempt to lick their wounds, survey the scene for a new manager and coaching staff turning the page from the Eric Wedge Era.
This does not fill me with dread…and I say that as a season-ticket holder.

No, what fills me with dread is the very real possibility that the Indians finish the year out strong and pull off one of their second half pushes, even if it’s only to the measured mediocrity that they reached last season.

What happens then?
What happens if the pattern of second half surges continues, as they have in three of the last four years?
Second Half 2005 – 47-34 (.580 WP)
Second Half 2006 – 40-41 (.493 WP)
Second Half 2007 – 47-34 (.580 WP)
Second Half 2008 – 44-37 (.543 WP)

Now that the team is looking like it was supposed to, with Sizemore (allegedly) healthy, Pronk back at some percentage of his former self, Cabrera healthy, Westbrook close to being ready, Laffey working his way back…what if this team starts playing well and some of the young players like Huff and Hurricane Perez start contributing, as do Matt LaPorta and Michael Brantley?

Is the argument gong to emerge to keep Wedge, because he kept the team “fighting” by “separating” and having players “run into one” now and again?

I certainly hope not because the second half has never been a problem for Wedge-managed teams that were thought to be contenders…the first half on the other hand, that’s another story:
First Half 2006 – 38-43 (.469 WP)
First Half 2007 – 49-32 (.605 WP)
First Half 2008 – 37-44 (.457 WP)
First Half 2009 – 32-49 (.395 WP)

We all know why this is relevant, but I’m going to put this up here in another manner to essentially put to rest the idea that keeping the Wedge for the second half of 2009 is going to “build momentum” under the guise of “stability”:

Second Half 2005 – 47-34 (.580 WP)
First Half 2006 – 38-43 (.469 WP)

Second Half 2006 – 40-41 (.493 WP)
First Half 2007 – 49-32 (.605 WP)

Second Half 2007 – 47-34 (.580 WP)
First Half 2008 – 37-44 (.457 WP)

Second Half 2008 – 44-37 (.543 WP)
First Half 2009 – 32-49 (.395 WP)

After the excitement of the 2005 season, when the Indians came up just short in the playoff chase, the team played 5 games under .500 in the first half in 2006…

After the 2007 ALCS year, the Indians came out of the gate flat, playing 7 games under .500 in the first 81 games in 2008…

After the furious finish of 2008 was supposed to “build momentum” for this year, the Tribe sat at a 17 game deficit under .500 after the first 81 games…

So, after the three best second half records posted over the last 4 years, teams managed by Wedge (with essentially the same players that closed out the years so strong and additions made in the off-season) saw their winning percentage drop precipitously enough to debunk any kind of absurd notion that stability from year to year, in terms of players or managers, has benefitted the Indians under Wedge.

That’s the fear though – what if the Indians go 48-31 over their remaining 78 games to finish 81-81 again (that’s a .607 WP clip) with pieces and parts healthy and the difficult portion of their schedule behind them…does that keep Eric Wedge’s job safe to start 2010?

If the idea that keeping Wedge to create momentum to 2010 is folly if you’re looking at a four-year body of work, what’s the upside in keeping Wedge aboard?

The argument is out there that the Indians aren’t going to find their long-term solution in early July and that interim managers don’t really do much more than hold the place on the bench for the manager to come; but what is the harm in allowing an interim manager to close out the season if a change is a necessary message that needs to be sent across the organization and with the knowledge that the 2009 season is over in terms of won-loss records?

If Joel Skinner closes out the year as the manager – so be it.
He knows he’s not the long-term answer just as well as the Indians do and the idea of getting a guy like Mike Hargrove or Buddy Bell (someone who’s killing time in early July with an MLB season underway) isn’t all that appealing to me. The guys they should be targeting (most notably John Farrell) have jobs right now and won’t be available until the off-season, but at least with Wedge securely out of the way and with the matter decided now, a search can start in earnest as soon as the season ends and we won’t be forced to go through this nonsense for the rest of the season with the dread of Wedge keeping his job hanging over our heads.

At the end of the day, the Indians find themselves now stuck with two scenarios, both equally distasteful – on one hand, the season continues to go south and Wedge is fired after the season, on the other hand, the season improves greatly and the “Should they Keep Eric Wedge” debate rages on into October.

A chance to acknowledge that this team is headed down the wrong path by sending a message that poor results won’t be tolerated in the name of “stability” and a chance to make a turn off of that wrong path has just been missed. As a result, we find ourselves on this same lonely path, accompanied by a dead man that we still find walking with us.

7 comments:

Ron Vallo said...

Hi Paul!

Good second half or not, the "should they keep Eric Wedge" debate is over - except maybe in the front office itself.

The fans have had enough and the one place the team will surely not rally in the second half is at the box office.

That should end the debate for those in the front office.

Ron Vallo said...

I hope!!

Cade said...

I must say, I still think Chris Perez will be good, but I can't think of a worse way to introduce yourself to a new team. It's like saying hello to your new girlfriend's family by dropping a bowel muffin on their kitchen table. Interesting statistic: in 50.2 innings this year, pitchers named Perez have given up 40 earned runs. Suggested future draft strategy: avoid humans named Perez.

Rockdawg said...

Is this latest Sowers outing (and his inability to pitch after a certain point) sort of like one of those "fool me once..." type of things? Only, I guess Sowers has now fooled everyone, like, 8 times or so?

Cy Slapnicka said...

Agreed. Doesn't something like this warrant firing the manager? Perhaps since the Indians obviously don't care about the outcome of the games he pitches, the paying fans shouldn't either. I mean, why would you stay for the 6th inning of an Indians game with Sowers pitching? So the organization could insult your intelligence and memory?

I don't care if they only have Raffy and Chris Perez sitting in a puddle of gasoline in the bullpen, we should never have to see another Sowers 6th inning.

By not doing anything, the club has told me, "we don't care if you follow us the remainder of the season. we will change nothing and expect different results."

Paul Cousineau said...

The top of the order is due up for their third time through the lineup when the 6th inning starts. Despite Sowers having thrown 67 pitches through 5 and despite having retired the last 8, wouldn't it make sense to at least have somebody warming up?

The possibility of facing Thome and Konerko is there if Sowers runs into trouble at the top of the order...so could they get Sipp (for Thome) and Smith (for Konerko) up to be loose for such a situation?

Apparently not, and (in case you didn't watch the game on TV), the decision was made to warm up Chris Perez very quickly, then bring him in to face Konerko in his 3rd appearance for the Tribe.

There's certainly blame on Perez for not executing, but the mishandling of the pitching staff in the 6th inning is almost completely on Wedge as they tried to play catch-up instead of planning for possible trouble.

"Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it."

Cy Slapnicka said...

"planning for possible trouble"?

More like, I had to fart, but considering I have diarrhea, I decided to sit on the can and fart, just in case I shart.

With both of these situations, if you fail to make a good decision, its too late to salvage anything and you may as well just call it a day and go home. There is no, "good thing I brought wet wipes and an extra pair of boxers and pants" just as there is no "i'll just warm up someone real quick from my craptastic bullpen".

fire eric wedge.