Tomahawks From the Top
As we all say thank goodness for the Twins (who are now
73-125 since they got swept out of the 2010 ALDS) to save us from ourselves
after the close to the Red Sox series that had everyone running to the 480
bridge while echoing the chorus that “THIS TEAM CAN’T HIT LHP” narrative with
the brilliant inclusion of Batting Average vs. LHP as the provided “proof”,
it’s time to dispel some inaccuracies, use some comparisons, and look to the
future for this Indians team.
Starting with this whole vs. LHP “issue”, everyone realizes
that the Indians have the 9th highest OPS vs. LHP in AL, the 8th highest wOBA vs. LHP in the AL (above the Tigers), and have the highest BB rate vs. LHP in all of baseball. A juggernaut
vs. LHP they are not (there are 14 AL teams)…but check out those links and see that
while the Indians’ performance against LHP leaves much to be desired, it has
been fairly middle-of-the-road compared to the league and placed in the proper
context. If you want to continue to use
Batting Average (which is not a completely useless stat, just one that
shouldn’t be used as a stand-alone stat), that’s fine, but the fact that we’ve
evolved past back-of-the-baseball card analysis elsewhere (and OPS and wOBA are
pretty easy stats to understand and pretty useful) means that we need to look
past this Batting Average vs. LHP “issue”.
Saying “they’re not the worst” may feel like a flimsy
argument, but we knew going into the season that this team was going to be
LH-heavy. Of course, a RH bat in there
would look great, but Acta nailed the situation (probably after being badgered about this whole LH thing again) this past weekend, saying “no one is sitting here
saying that Choo, Brantley, Kipnis are platoon players. They were going to
play against righties and lefties, regardless of our situation. . . . Should we
trade Choo and Kipnis for right-handed hitters?”
Full disclosure that I was behind the idea of Brantley as a
platoon player…but point made.
The Indians are hitting RH pitching fairly well (.754 OPS, 5th in MLB), but the fact that their OPS vs. LHP ranks 16th in all of
MLB starts to dispel this notion that they’re unquestionably the WORST team in
MLB vs. LHP as there are actually two teams (the White Sox – with RH Paul Konerko – and the Nationals) below the .600 OPS line vs. LHP.
Yes, a RH 1B or RH LF (and don’t you say his name because
I’m getting to him while not mentioning his name because of the moratorium)
would work in the middle of the lineup, but as I hope against hope that Mike
Brantley has actually figured out this “hitting” thing (and I could care less
WHERE he hits as long as he IS hitting, although his May OPS of .697 isn’t that
much different than his April OPS of .677) and gladly welcome my Big League
Choo back with open arms (1.050 OPS in the last week), I’m going to ignore this
vs, LHP “issue” until someone can provide some compelling evidence that this
team CANNOT hit LHP…and evidence that doesn’t rely solely on Batting Average.
With that off my chest (for now), let’s get some Tomahawks
in the air…
__________
In the wake of the Derek Lowe complete game shutout, some
have started to compare this 2012 team’s start to the one from just a year ago,
positing that this year’s incarnation is lacking in the starting pitching
department to date since Lowe is carrying this pitching staff. While I’m not going to disagree with that as
Masterson or (gulp) Ubaldo getting on track makes season-long contention that
much more possible, it is worth comparing the start to the last two seasons for
the rotations, in terms of expectations and early returns. That is to say that the early outings for
Masterson and Ubaldo have been…um, uneven and that the middle-to-back-end of
the rotation (mainly Lowe and Jeanmar) have kept the Indians atop the Central
to date.
But if you remember back to last May, isn’t that kind of
what happened last year too?
Lest you forget, this was the rotation that broke camp last
year…in this order:
Carmona/Hernandez
Carrasco
Masterson
Tomlin
Talbot
Yes, Jeanmar had worked his way into the mix in April and Al
White made his first appearance at the end of April, but once Talbot got
healthy, that was the rotation into July for a team that was sitting at the top
of the AL Central for much of that time.
Seriously, Mitch Talbot – who not even a year later is pitching for the
SAMSUNG LIONS in the KOREAN LEAGUE – logged eleven starts for the team before
the All-Star Break and would end the year unleashing his own particular brand
of “Fury” with the 5th most starts (12) on a team that would finish
80-82.
Sure, you say…but Masterson had a great 2011 season and
Tomlin had a great 1st half while Carrasco showed the type of
promise that makes his injury all the more painful now. That’s all true, but GOING into 2011, who saw
that coming from Masterson or Tomlin?
Essentially, in the first couple of months of the 2011
season we saw the middle-to-back-end of the rotation become the top and the top
of the rotation slip into inconsistency, making them much less effective than
the pitchers that they were thought to be ahead of in the rotation when 2011
started.
Now, think of this year…
Already, we’ve seen the 3rd starter (Lowe) vault
into the position of being the Tribe’s best starter (just as Masterson did last
year) and we’ve seen Jeanmar throw solidly in the first month-and-a-half of the
season, just as Tomlin did last year.
Yes, Masterson and Ubaldo have been overwhelming disappointments, but
the 2012 rotation is getting the same kind of surprise production from arms
that weren’t being counted on as front-of-the-rotation pitchers in the early
going.
Just to put some hard numbers to this, compare where the
Opening Day rotation stood around this time last year and where this year’s
incarnation does:
2011 Staff through
mid-to-late May in order of Opening Day Rotation
Carmona/Hernandez – 4.76 ERA on May 19, 2011
Carrasco – 5.16 ERA on May 22, 2011
Masterson – 2.52 ERA on May 18, 2011
Tomlin – 2.56 ERA on May 16, 2011
Talbot – 5.87 ERA on May 25, 2011
2012 Staff through
May 15th in order of Opening Day Rotation
Masterson – 5.40 ERA
Ubaldo – 5.18 ERA
Lowe – 2.05 ERA
Tomlin – 4.67 ERA
Jeanmar – 3.75 ERA
Disappointment at the top and pleasant surprises in the
middle-to-back in both groupings…
Two pitchers with an ERA over 5.00 on each staff, one close
to 5.00 and two “surprises” to lead the staff made up your FIRST-PLACE rotation
for the 2011 team at this time last year and similar production from
(strangely) similar spots in the rotation for the 2012 Tribe. While you can certainly say that the way that
the 2011 rotation was unable to sustain their success provides a foreboding
feeling for this group going forward, the success of Derek Lowe provides hope
that the Indians can straighten out their “top 2” (or at least Masterson) this
year.
If you’ll remember, the Tribe targeted Lowe VERY early in
the off-season, fleecing the Braves by trading only a minor-league arm (who is
still in AA) for him AND having the Braves pay $10M of his $15M salary in
2012. He was targeted because the
Indians saw something in his mechanics that was easily “fixable” and, if
“fixed”, could result in a return to effectiveness for him. It has been an achievement in scouting and
coaching (wait…by the Indians and their Polo Shirt Mafia Front Office, who spend
all their time poring over spreadsheets?) and, given that the Indians were able
to identify and correct Lowe’s issues, it provides some hope that they can identify
and (perhaps) improve a pitcher like Masterson or even…gulp, Ubaldo.
Sure, Ubaldo may be too far gone (because he looks it) or he
may not be as receptive as an eager-to-prove-himself Lowe was when he arrived
in Cleveland, but the Indians (obviously) targeted Jimenez last July with the
idea that they could “fix” him as they seem to have with Lowe. “Fixing” Ubaldo may never materialize and he
may become Fausto v.2.0, in terms of frustration and unfulfilled talent. But remember that the 2011 Indians contended
on the strength of their rotation, with the lion’s share of the contributions
coming from unforeseen sources.
Now that Zach McAllister has arrived for a while (and it’s
easy to forget that both he and Jeanmar are only 24 years old) and the Indians’
rotation could have some moving pieces here.
While I’m not sure if a DL stint is in the offing for Ubaldo (and I
think they’ve almost suggested to him that he’s injured, if only because Acta
says he asks him SO much if he’s healthy) if his mechanics remain messy, but
Corey Kluber (acquired for Westbrook in what seems like a trade from a decade
ago) and Scotty Barnes (netted for Ryan Garko) are two other starters in AAA who are averaging more than a K an inning while limiting opposing hitters to an OPS under .700. Neither of those guys
scream “big-time pitching prospect” (though Barnes has always intrigued me), but let’s remember that Tomlin and Gomez
have graduated to MLB and surprised in their brief time there.
Last year, the Indians rotation led from the back and, if
the early returns provide a glimpse, we may be seeing it again with the hope
that the “front” (Masterson and…have to say it, Ubaldo) can rebound to their
former selves (or some semblance of their former selves) to continue to set the
pace in the AL Central.
__________
For whatever reason, every team “features” a whipping boy
for fans and critics alike to rail against.
While vitriol is inexplicably always reserved for the 24th or
25th man on the roster (as I’m not sure I understand what hating
Aaron Cunningham accomplishes and have NO problem with this team carrying Dan
Wheeler – a veteran reliever with a track record who was here merely to mop up
and absorb innings in losses – for 6 weeks), Casey Kotchman finds himself
firmly in the crosshairs of most Tribe fans, who have deluded themselves to
believe that a player who was unquestionably not the “answer” last year (and who still isn’t the “answer” this year…and has 1 XBH and a .557 OPS in his last 10 games) represents an upgrade, merely because he ISN’T Casey Kotchman.
However, if you go into this realizing what Casey Kotchman
is (and isn’t), what he’s done is pretty much what we’ve expected – he’s played
stellar defense and will have hot and cold stretches at the plate with the cold
stretches likely to cause the hand-wringing and moaning that we experienced in
April. However, Kotchman has a .759 OPS
in May (nestled between Choo and Santana for the month to date) and – while
that won’t make anyone begin making a bronze casting for Cooperstown – it
certainly brings him into the level of acceptable or respectable
production. What his recent run at the
plate has done is raise his season totals to the point that he’s creeping ever
closer to a .600 OPS. And while that’s
said with the tongue firmly in cheek, check out where he now ranks among MLB 1B in OPS, above Eric Hosmer, Justin Smoak, Gaby Sanchez (who, admittedly was on
my “wish list” this off-season), Al Pujols and Ike Davis. Unfortunately, that perspective is what gets
lost too often as people rail against this player or that player as Kotchman’s
3 HR mean that he has more than Adrian Gonzalez, Carlos Lee (another player
that everyone wanted to target this off-season), and the aforementioned Pujols
and Gaby Sanchez.
Don’t take this to mean that I’m comfortable just putting
Casey Kotchman out there at 1B for the rest of the season…it’s an attempt to
provide some context to the situation. That
is, Kotchman is who we knew who was, is getting paid $3M (the Tribe signed
Branyan to a $1.5M deal in 2010 and traded him in late June of that year) for
the season, and once (or if) a better alternative presents itself, I’m all for
upgrading the roster by improving at 1B.
That doesn’t mean that Kotchman would go the way of Branyan or any of
the other Tribe 1B of the past (meaning that he wouldn’t automatically become a
Mariner) as his defense is a special skill, but that alternative hasn’t
presented itself and – almost, but not entirely, independent of Kotchman’s
performance at the plate – he should stay there until it does.
__________
With that said, it is fun around this time of the year to
play the “would this guy be available” game and while I’ve seen or heard the
Josh Willingham and Kevin Youkilis conjecture (and here is Buster Olney thinking that Youkilis may not be long for Boston) dating back to last off-season,
there was something in a recent article on B-Pro that caught my eye. The article focused on where the Padres are
going (which is nowhere) and how San
Diego may become a trading post, and perhaps very
soon. In the piece Geoff Young (who is
the founder of Ducksnorts, a Padres’ blog) goes in-depth into the Padres’
roster, providing some insight into some different players that may be made
available if the Padres’ season continues to circle the drain.
One name in particular stood out in the piece that Young dubbed likely to be available:
Carlos Quentin, LF (29): The
man that Josh Byrnes let get away in Arizona, formerly represented by
Jeff Moorad (he almost owned the Padres, sort of, for a few years... until one
day he didn’t) started the season on the disabled list and is currently
rehabbing in the minors. There was speculation when the Padres traded for
Quentin that they might try to lock him up long-term, but given his spotty
health record and the fact that Petco Park isn’t the ideal place for a slow,
slugging outfielder (Ryan Ludwick sends his regards), this may not be the
best option. As with Huston Street ,
though, he needs to get healthy before any moves are made.
--snip--
I don’t expect Street
or Quentin to fetch much. If I were the Padres, I’d be looking for more
middle-infield depth in the high minors; failing that, I’d take a shot on guys
at lower levels with live arms who maybe haven’t translated stuff into results.
When Quentin was moved in the off-season from the South Side
to San Diego, it felt like the type of move that the Indians should have been
in on, even if their…um, relationship with the White Sox Front Office (one minor trade since 1994) probably prevented it.
Realizing that Quentin is hurt (and his “repaired” right knee may not be all that healthy if it flares up when he gets into his batting stance) and that he may or may not even be on the field until June, unless
Johnny Damon can break out of his “Spring Training mode” with a flurry, the
Indians could be looking to upgrade in LF…again. Maybe the Tribe is thinking that Sizemore’s
return will push the suddenly rejuvenated Brantley to LF, but if Young is right
that the Padres would target “middle-infield depth in the high minors”, that’s
something that the Indians could actually offer in the form of Cord Phelps or
even the recently-demoted Jason Donald.
As the author says, he doesn’t expect “Quentin to fetch much”, but he
could become a nice option in LF or at DH for the 2nd half of the
season…assuming health, of course.
__________
Regardless of what’s to come or how the Indians attempt to
find another band-aid in LF or 1B (or if they even are able to), let’s go back
to what was written this past weekend and realize that this is fun. This is fun to follow a 1st place
team and fun to target other teams’ players as possibilities for Trading
Deadline reinforcements. While it isn’t
ALWAYS fun, it is hard to remember what Carlos Santana once famously said…“this
is the baseball”.
3 comments:
One counterpoint to your "vs LHP" argument...looking @ OPS, the Indians have the 4th largest drop-off in OPS (104 points) vs. LHP as compared to RHP, better than only the Nationals (110 points) Cubs (111 points) and White Sox (122 points). So while you're absolutely correct that, empirically, the Indians are *not* the worst in the game at hitting LHPs, they do experience one of the largest declines in
performance when facing LHP.
Here's a link to the quick spreadsheet I threw together to calculate: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvRdGiOb5dwodEtENmVaNUNMdmx4Qm5GM05VNDgtMWc
Jeff,
That's fair (with some great legwork on the splits) to point out. I suppose my attempt was more to debunk this idea that as soon as the Indians faced a LHP, their bats turned into toothpicks as that seems to have become an accepted narrative when it isn't really all that true.
They're MUCH better vs. RHP (as you point out), but it's not as if they're completely worthless against LHP, which is how many are painting them.
aa
Post a Comment